PRND[S]
The Lame & The Ludicrous
- Location
- Southern California
- Car(s)
- '15 LSG Golf R
What's your budget and what are you going to do with it?
i started working on editing skills again and started shooting in raw
Overexpose in lieu of underexposing. Play around a lot to find the limits of your software. Its supposed to be fun, right?
To the guy asking about starter gear, dont count out Micro Four Thirds from Olympus. Jus' observin.
Overexpose in lieu of underexposing. Play around a lot to find the limits of your software. Its supposed to be fun, right?
To the guy asking about starter gear, dont count out Micro Four Thirds from Olympus. Jus' observin.
So overexpose then edit it out? would this also cause less grain?
i was never a fan of editing, mainly cause im impatient, and i feel it isn't 100% pure camera work.
that being said, 99.9999999999% of badass photography is all edited, so i might as well take advantage of it.
im working with photochop cs6
Well, don't overexpose on purpose, but if it happens, your salvage rate will increase. Ive tried to underexpose before (to try to get my shutter speed out of the 'camera shake' zone) and bring it back out, but it was horribly grainy.
Photoshop will be a good tool as you learn more about it, which I really don't, I use the Linux version of Lightroom, Darktable, and the Linux Photoshop, which is called gimp.
When I started out, I shot totally in JPEG, because I didn't have the software to edit. I think this made me a better photographer, because I knew I had to get it right the first time.
I find too much post processing to be off-putting and obvious, so as for the 99% comment, I think all good photographers would disagree. I do very little, raise the sharpness, bring out a little color, and maybe increase black point and for the most part I get good results. Portrait and wedding photographers are the ones that have to be able to doctor up things.
Too much post processing turns it into a job, and takes the fun out.
Not bashing the Photochop experts, its definetly a skill, but for my shit I don't need it.
I was always told to underexpose instead of overexpose :iono:
i started working on editing skills again and started shooting in raw. tips are appreciated
photoshoot1 045 edit by Baronian Photography, on Flickr
photoshoot1 037 edit by Baronian Photography, on Flickr
photoshoot1 033 edit by Baronian Photography, on Flickr
photoshoot1 029 edit by Baronian Photography, on Flickr
photoshoot1 048 edit by Baronian Photography, on Flickr
I consider changing the sharpness, saturation and playing with blacks and whites as editing. I consider everything as editing unless you block out/blur license plates for safety and personal reasons.
It's very hard to get good, true color out of a semi-basic body and lens, and that's fine. Editing brings that back.
The only thing I'm doing is playing with exposure, saturation, sharpness and once in a while, lens correction if I don't want the wide angle effect.
Your shots look great Btw. Loving that sunset shot.
Sent via my hairs.
I have a E-M1, I love it. I came from the full-sized Four Thirds system and I find the small size of the Micro Four Thirds to be very liberating. Also, the E-M1 makes my E-5 look sooooo primitive...I plan on getting the OMD-EM1 soon so i ca use my older 4/3 Olympus lenses with autofocus. Im pretty excited.