The COVID19 SCAMdemic... California Nears $8 Gallon Gas - Biden Sends Zelenskyyy $61 Billion

[npace]

You don't have an opinion on whether massive tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, white nationalism, and rampant corruption is better or worse that public funded health and education, living wages, and opposing white nationalism?

Didn't we go over this? Aren't the wealthy the only ones who pay taxes, and therefore, are the ones who can get "massive tax breaks"?

 

[anotero]

Actually, Congress voted almost unanimously to give President Bush the Authority to Use Force (the AUMF) in Afghanistan and later in Iraq (the Senate, including Hillary Clinton, voted in favor, but you claim you voted for her, so you know, right?)

President Obama authorized air strikes in Libya to support the uprising against Ghaddafi starting in early 2011. Three months into military action in Libya, the Obama administration released a statement that they did not require Congressional approval. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ional-approval/2011/06/15/AGLttOWH_story.html

So no, you're wrong, a republican congress did not approve Obama's military action in Libya.

I'm no fan of the Bush wars, but Obama is equally responsible for expanding a bunch of the programs he ran against: drone strikes, extraordinary renditions, the war in Afghanistan aka "the good war". He even authorized the murder of a US citizen despite a lack of due process and it being a direct violation of the constitution. Again, the two party system is a sham, and has given people like you the illusion of choice.

Biden is expanding the military budget, even though he supposedly claimed he wouldn't. Dem fanboyz are morons, especially when they pretend they are better than rep fanboyz.

 

[jimlloyd40]

You don't have an opinion on whether massive tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, white nationalism, and rampant corruption is better or worse that public funded health and education, living wages, and opposing white nationalism?

Yes of course I do.

 

[Escape Hatch]

Didn't we go over this? Aren't the wealthy the only ones who pay taxes, and therefore, are the ones who can get "massive tax breaks"?

Actually it's roughly the top 10% of earners.

 

[anotero]

HE HAS A MASTERS DEGREE!!!!!!!!!

Dos!

 

[anotero]

I'm pretty sure the side with nazis and white supremacist supporting them and holding rallies for them are the side that's worse. If you're s Nazi or white supremacist, you might think otherwise, but it's pretty clear to me.

You really don't think the party calling for living wages, public funding of health care and education, and for billionaires to actually pay income taxes isn't looking out for the publics interests?

LOLOLOLOL. Rainbow flag waving invasions of other countries are more morally upstanding than confederate flag waving invasions. (c)
Gretafan

 

[anotero]

You did mean the democrats right?

https://www.history.com/topics/reconstruction/ku-klux-klan

Ouch.

 

[npace]

You don't have an opinion on whether massive tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, white nationalism, and rampant corruption is better or worse that public funded health and education, living wages, and opposing white nationalism?

Also, the Nazis were socialists. Nazi is short for the German word for National Socialist Party. And before you get indignant and cite a bunch of meaningless articles by vox or whoever that say they weren't, here's the difference between the National Socialists and the Communists: the Nazis allowed businesses to be owned by individuals / corporations but controlled labor, costs, and output, eliminating any shred of free market economy. The Communists wanted the government to own the means of production, so there was less pretending. The reason they hated each other so much is because they were cutting in on each other's action.

 

[GTIfan99]

Also, the Nazis were socialists. Nazi is short for the German word for National Socialist Party. And before you get indignant and cite a bunch of meaningless articles by vox or whoever that say they weren't, here's the difference between the National Socialists and the Communists: the Nazis allowed businesses to be owned by individuals / corporations but controlled labor, costs, and output, eliminating any shred of free market economy. The Communists wanted the government to own the means of production, so there was less pretending. The reason they hated each other so much is because they were cutting in on each other's action.

What does that have to do with what I posted, Mr. Both sides guy?

 

[GTIfan99]

Yes of course I do.

You literally just said you don't, because you're an independent, who ironically voted twice for the guy that nazis and white supremacists held rallies for, had always been openly corrupt and cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations, while instituting expiring cuts for the poor and middle class, that turn into increases.

 

[anotero]

Actually it's roughly the top 10% of earners.

Wait, so am i a top earner just because i pay taxes?

 

[anotero]

Also, the Nazis were socialists. Nazi is short for the German word for National Socialist Party. And before you get indignant and cite a bunch of meaningless articles by vox or whoever that say they weren't, here's the difference between the National Socialists and the Communists: the Nazis allowed businesses to be owned by individuals / corporations but controlled labor, costs, and output, eliminating any shred of free market economy. The Communists wanted the government to own the means of production, so there was less pretending. The reason they hated each other so much is because they were cutting in on each other's action.

Nazis were not socialists, except in name only. Not a single one of their policies were socialist. They threw the word in the party name to attract the German working class.

 

[npace]

What does that have to do with what I posted, Mr. Both sides guy?

Because your democrat friends are closer to socialists, and therefore Nazis. I'm not going to get into Trump populism and white supremacy, because neither side has a leg to stand on with that argument, as @Escape Hatch pointed out. And you never answered my question before, so I'll ask again: Both sides of what?

 

[npace]

Nazis were not socialists, except in name only. Not a single one of their policies were socialist. They threw the word in the party name to attract the German working class.

Except that the 25 point Nazi program of 1921 has several socialist policies included in it. I know you don't want to be associated with them (nobody does) but it is a fact.

 

[anotero]

Also, the Nazis were socialists. Nazi is short for the German word for National Socialist Party. And before you get indignant and cite a bunch of meaningless articles by vox or whoever that say they weren't, here's the difference between the National Socialists and the Communists: the Nazis allowed businesses to be owned by individuals / corporations but controlled labor, costs, and output, eliminating any shred of free market economy. The Communists wanted the government to own the means of production, so there was less pretending. The reason they hated each other so much is because they were cutting in on each other's action.

Bro, Hitler and the NSDAP were brought to power by people like Krupp and other big German capital. The Nazi party was essentially the rule of capital itself, without a bourgeoisie democratic election system as an intermediary.